United States v. Klein’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 1182 · 1994
Citation profile
51 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably United States v. Webster (1996), United States v. Maza (1996)
51 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chimel v. California · Berkemer v. McCarty · Colorado v. Connelly · California v. Beheler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“two or more sentences imposed at the same time 'are not related for purposes of Sec. 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencing under separate docket numbers, and there was no formal order of consolidation.'”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]rior sentences imposed in related cases are to be treated as one sentence for purposes of the criminal history”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a conflict of interest, an irreconcilable conflict, or a complete breakdown in communication between”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.