Clark v. Tansy’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 1407 · 1993
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Ohlander v. Larson (1997), Phillips USA, Inc. v. Allflex USA, Inc. (1996)
20 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Coleman v. Thompson · Fay v. Noia · Rose v. Lundy · McCleskey v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen considering a motion to dismiss without prejudice, 'the important aspect is whether the opposing party will suffer prejudice in the light of the valid interests of the parties.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the petitioner's ability to present claims of constitutional violations ... merely because the petitioner has unwittingly fallen into a procedural trap created by the intricacies of habeas corpus law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Parmenter“the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.