Gaspard v. Amerada Hess Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 165 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 46 U.S.C. § 30106
Relies on Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland · Foremost Insurance v. Richardson · Sisson v. Ruby · Wrenn v. Weinberger · Wolff v. McDonnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“attached to Whitley's motion for summary judgment filed in accordance with Local Rule 2.10 of the Middle District of Louisiana. Smith's failure to oppose Whitley's motion for summary judgment means that these facts are admitted for purposes of review of the denial of summary judgment, except to the extent that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Brenoettsy“We have previously expressed doubt as to the propriety of summary judgment as a tool for disposing of a case on jurisdictional grounds when the district court does not actually purport to address the merits of the parties' dispute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.