Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.3d 232 - Harrell v. United States

Harrell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.3d 232 · 1993

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably Schneider v. California Department of Corrections (1998), Black v. Lane (1994)

35 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

4201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 28 U.S.C. § 1340 · 28 U.S.C. § 2410

Relies on United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc · Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · United States v. Brosnan · Hughes · Early v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress providing for internal revenue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] plaintiff cannot amend [her] complaint by a brief that [she] files in the ... court of appeals.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “as that term is used in either § 1330 or the FSIA. 4 Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed Shrock's claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To the extent that Shrock sought an injunction, the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a), affirmatively”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.