United States v. Talk’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 369 · 1993
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2014
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2242 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Brewster v. Derwinski · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · Konigsberg v. State Bar of California · United States v. Castro-Cervantes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the admission of testimony from an unlisted rebuttal witness for abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“emphathize[d] with the district court’s efforts to fashion a just sentence, the official commentary to the Guidelines is clear: “The base offense level represents sexual abuse as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 2242 . An enhancement is provided for use of force; threat of death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; or certain other means as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2241 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“we review de novo the district court's interpretation that the Guidelines provide it no power to depart downward from the prescribed sentencing range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.