Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.3d 515 - Sykes v. James

Sykes v. James’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.3d 515 · 1993

Citation profile

226
cited by 226 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 226 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Chance v. Armstrong (1998), Thomas v. Roach (1999)

25 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

8001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Parratt v. Taylor · Malley v. Briggs · Daniels v. Williams · Allen v. McCurry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 226 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]ection 1983 itself creates no substantive rights; it provides only a procedure for redress for the deprivation of rights established elsewhere.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “provides a civil claim for damages against any person who, acting under color of state law, deprives another of a right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution or the laws of the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.