Samuels v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 522 · 1993
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (1997), Glenn v. Bartlett (1996)
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we `will not overrule a prior decision of a panel of this Court absent a change in the law by higher authority or by way of an in banc proceeding of this Court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“are not entitled to habeas relief based on trial error unless they can establish that it resulted in 'actual prejudice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burks v. Borg“had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Latine v. Mann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.