Minot v. Eckardt-Minot’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 590 · 1994
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co (1996), Snapper, Inc. v. Redan (1999)
27 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Louisiana Power Light Company v. City of Thibodaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A state court should lead the way in developing the law [for something amounting to a 'tort of custodial interference'], balancing the delicate issues involved here.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“since the District Court invoked abstention doctrines ... to justify its remand, section 1447(d) does not bar appellate review”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“conclusively determine [ ] which forum will decide the merits of [this] dispute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.