In Re Leonard J Siciliano Prudential Savings Bank Pasa’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Sacred Heart Hospital v. Pennsylvania (1998), In Re Margaret J Myers Margaret J Myers
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · Albany Partners Ltd Albany Partners Ltd v. Wp Westbrook Albany Partners Ltd Wp Westbrook Ww C · Maritime Electric Co. v. United Jersey Bank · Schwartz v. United States · 26 663 74447 Allegheny International Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]n request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the stay provided under subsection (a) of this section, such as by terminating, annulling, modifying, or conditioning such stay [] for cause.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In addition to the obvious power to ‘terminate’ the stay, [362(d) ] also gives the bankruptcy court the power to ‘annul’ the stay. The difference between the two is that an order annulling the stay could operate retroactively to the date of the filing of the petition which gave rise to the stay, and thus validate actions taken by the party at a time when he may have been unaware of the existence of the stay. On the other hand, an order terminating the stay would be operative only from the date of its entry.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he inclusion of the word ‘annulling’ in the statute, indicates a legislative intent to apply certain types of relief retroactively and validate the proceedings that would otherwise be void ab initio.... We note that, if such relief did not apply retroactively, then ‘its inclusion next to “terminating” would be superfluous.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.