United States v. Boutte’s Empirical Analysis
13 F.3d 855 · 1994
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States of America v. James Slaughter (2000), United States v. Phillips (2000)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 287
Relies on Turner v. United States · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n · Logarusic v. United States · Dix v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where substantial evidence of actual knowledge exists.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“need only have participated knowingly in some part of the criminal enterprise”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.