Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 F.3d 986 - United States v. Taylor

United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

13 F.3d 986 · 1994

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Paladino (2005), United States, v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno (1999)

42 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

300199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 924(c)'s unit of prosecution is the underlying offense, not the number of firearms.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence is sufficient to uphold a jury conviction if after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and drawing all inferences in the government's favor, a reasonable juror could find that each element of the offense has been established beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “indictment charges a single predicate offense, a court may not enter a judgment of conviction against a defendant, and may not sentence a defendant, for multiple § 924(c) counts in relation to that single predicate offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.