Cangemi v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 33 U.S.C. § 2215 · 33 U.S.C. § 2282 · 33 U.S.C. § 408
Relies on United States v. Gaubert · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Berkovitz v. United States · Makarova v. United States · Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the jury award of punitive damages in this case is inconsistent with the district court's finding of arguable probable cause, and, if so, [whether] such 11 STANDARD OF REVIEW We review de novo a district court's decision on a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the [nonmoving] party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.