Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 F. App'x 112

Wimmer v. Painter

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-06-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2001-06-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Dickie Frelin Wimmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wimmer v. Painter, No. CA-98-292-5 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/13/fappx/112 · .json · Public domain