Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 F. App'x 195

Dachman v. Siegel

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-07-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2006

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-07-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 S. Rebecca Dachman appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, and denying her motion for reconsideration, in this Bivens * action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dachman v. Siegel, No. CA-00-965-AMD (D. Md. Dec. 4 & 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/13/fappx/195 · .json · Public domain