¶1 Mario Ballard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ballard v. True, No. CA-00-264-3 (E.D.Va. Oct 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *99 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED.