Jackson v. Baker

¶1stopped Meredith, who was for the plaintiff; and informed the jury, that the defendant ought either to have paid this money to the plaintiff, or enabled him to look to the purchaser. But that he had not done the former, and had disabled himself from doing the latter. That the plaintiff could not have sued the purchaser, because the simple contract debt was extinguished by the bond; and the defendant, having mixed the debt due to himself, and to the plaintiff, in one bond, taken in his own name, that the plaintiff had no remedy in the bond; and it does not appear, that any offer was made to assign the bond. If the plaintiff cannot recover from the defendant now, when can he recover? Sue him when he pleases, the defendant may keep him at arm’s length, by saying, “I have not yet collected the money.” Whereas, the debt having been originally due to the plaintiff, he might have sued for it at any time, in his own name, if he had not been prevented by the conduct of the defendant; who, if he is the cause why the plaintiff cannot sue the real debtor, makes himself the debtor. The jury found accordingly for the plaintiff.