Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 FSUPP 1020 - Kirk v. Good

Kirk v. Good’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1971
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1971

1 state decisions

10192919301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Arthur Manigault v. Alfred a Springs · Belknap v. Schild · Gibson v. United States · State of Louisiana v. William Gibbs McAdoo · State of Oregon v. Ethan a Hitchcock a

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Officers of the United States are not subject to suit by a private party where no personal judgment is sought and such officers have no individual interest in the controversy, but where the United States is the only real party in interest, and against whom alone the relief sought is effective.” (p. 1021.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.