Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 F. Supp. 630

Goess v. Ehret

U.S. District Court

Decided January 15, 1936

U.S. District Court · decided 1936-01-15

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1948

1 state decisions

Relies on Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MOSCO WITZ, District Judge.

¶1This action was brought to recover the sum of $252,054.92 on a promissory note. A jury trial was waived. A counterclaim was interposed based upon fraud on the part of the officers of the Harriman National Bank in the sale of its own stock.

¶2Defendant purchased 100 shares of stock of the bank on certain misrepresentations made by Harriman. These shares of stock sold to the defendant were sold out of the Harriman Securities Corporation’s suspense account. The amount of the price was credited to the securities corporation.

¶3Defendant by way of relief requests that the bank take back the shares of its own stock and pay to the defendant the purchase price of these shares. This relief cannot be granted. Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank, 295 U.S. 209, 55 S. Ct. 674, 79 L.Ed. 1393.

¶4The bank was not permitted to sell stock. If it attempted to do. so, a person dealing with it would have no recourse for any loss that might occur. There can be no relief in this case.

¶5Judgment for the plaintiff.

¶6Settle findings and decree on notice.

/13/fsupp/630 · .json · Public domain