In re Rapier Sugar Feed Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1984
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on John Voorhees v. James Jackson · Charles Williamson and Catharine His Wife v. Joseph Berry · Robertson v. Howard · Veazie v. Williams · In re Burr Mfg. & Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The final order of confirmation has the effect of a final, conclusive judgment. It cures all irregularities, misconduct, and unfairness in the making of the sale, and errors in the order itself and proceedings under it, if the court had jurisdiction to order the sale and the selling officer had authority to sell.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.