Mono v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2016
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Smith v. Lightning Bolt Productions, Inc. · Song v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Rabbi Yitzchok Leblanc-Sternberg v. Robert Fletcher · Bevevino v. Saydjari
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion was made and to give that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences that the jury might have drawn in his favor from the evidence. The court can not assess the weight of conflicting evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute its judgment for that of the jury[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Not surprisingly, courts reviewing jury awards for loss of parental guidance have generally reduced awards to adult children to a fraction of the amount recoverable by infant children. (Citing cases.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.