Speight v. Griggs’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Terry v. Ohio · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Eleventh Circuit has not decided whether or in what circumstances the purely accidental discharge of a firearm implicates the Fourth Amendment.”), vacated in pan per curiam, 620 Fed.Appx. 806 (11th Cir.2015). . Speight v. Griggs, 620 Fed.Appx. 806, 809 (11th Cir.2015) (per curiam). . See Crenshaw v. Lister, 556 F.3d 1283, 1289-90 (11th Cir.2009) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cantrell v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.