Tomlin v. JCS Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 202 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 49 U.S.C. § 13102 · 49 U.S.C. § 30102 · 49 U.S.C. § 304 · 49 U.S.C. § 31502
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Neither continuity of interstate movement nor isolated' segments of the trip can be decisive. The test is one of practicality. As long as the carrier is'in process of getting goods to their final destination, the goods remain in [interstate] commerce.”. George R. Hall, Inc. v. Superior Trucking Co., Inc., 514 F.Supp. 581, 584 (N.D.Ga.1981) (determining jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act) (citing New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. v. Nothnagle, 346 U.S. 128, 130 , 73 S.Ct. 986 , 97 L.Ed. 1500 (1953), Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 317 U.S. 564 , 63 S.Ct. 332 , 87 L.Ed. 460 (1943), and Galbreath v. Gulf Oil Corp., 294 F.Supp. 817 (ND.Ga.1968), aff'd, 413 F.2d 941 (5th Cir.1969)). “Whether the transportation is of an interstate nature can be ‘determined by reference to the intended final destination’ of the transportation when the ultimate destination was envisaged at the time the transportation commenced. The intent at the time of transportation commences ‘fixes the character of the shipment for all the legs of the transport within the United States.’ ” Bilyou v. Dutchess Beer Distributors, 300 F.3d 217, 223-24 (2d Cir.2002) (citing, inter alia, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky, 275 U.S. 257, 269 , 48 S.Ct. 107 , 72 L.Ed. 270 (1927) (determining continuity of transportation by examining whether the destination of the goods “is arranged for or fixed in the minds of the sellers”)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.