Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Ga. App. 486

Durham v. Page

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1913

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1913-09-23

<p>Certiorari; from Hart superior court — Judge Meadow. March 7, 1913.</p>

Relies on Jackson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1913-09-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1986

4 state decisions

2019131920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Russell, J.

¶1Where a bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of the judge of the superior court to sanction a petition for certiorari, and the petition is not set forth in the bill of exceptions, nor attached thereto as an exhibit, but is specified and sent up as a part of the record, no question is presented for decision by this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Where the judge of the superior court refuses to sanction the certiorari, the petition does not become a part of the record and can not be brought to this court as such. A petition for certiorari, if not sanctioned, is not a part of the record. Taylor v. Town of Omega, 12 Ga. App. 693 (78 S. E. 144), and citations.

¶2 Writ of error dismissed.

/13/gaapp/486 · .json · Public domain