Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 HAW 392 - Fishel v. Turner

Fishel v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2020

8 state decisions

401901191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Morris · Beckwith v. Talbot · Scarritt v. St. John's Methodist Episcopal Church · Oakman v. Rogers · Malani v. Alapai

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that in cases of this kind detached unsigned writings in order to be connected with signed writings must be referred to in the signed writings, but that if all the writings are signed it is sufficient if they all refer to the oral agreement, and that whether they do refer to the same oral agreement or transaction may be determined by internal evidence and coincidences, through inspection and comparison. Thayer v. Luce, 22 Oh. St. 62.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.