Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ill. 2d 200 - Ariola v. Nigro

13 Ill. 2d 200 - Ariola v. Nigro’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably 76 Ill. 2d 427 - Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp. (1979), 138 Ill. 2d 458 - Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church (1990)

84 state decisions

24019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Cold Metal Process Company v. United Engineering & Foundry Company · Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks · Republic of China v. American Express Co. · Vale v. Bonnett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Judgment As To Fewer Than All Parties or Claims— Necessity for Special Finding. If multiple parties or multiple claims for relief are involved in an action, an appeal may be taken from a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the parties or claims only if the trial court has made an express written finding that there is no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal. Such a finding may be made at the time of the entry of the judgment or thereafter on the court’s own motion or on motion of any party. The time for filing the notice of appeal shall run from the entry of the required finding. In the absence of such a finding, any judgment that adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties is not enforceable or appealable and is subject to revision at any time before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all the claims, rights, and liabilities of all the parties.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 110A, par. 304(a).”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The language of section 50(2), as well as the comments of the committee which drafted it, indicate that a flexible and reasonable meaning was intended for the ‘claims’ to which the section refers. The section itself speaks in terms of a final judgment or decree that adjudicates less than ‘all the claims or rights and liabilities;’ (emphasis supplied,) and upon two occasions the advisory committee comments that its provisions are to take effect when there is a final judgment adjudicating fewer than ‘all the matters involved.’ (Smith-Hurd Anno. Stat., Perm. Ed. chap. 110, sec. 50(2), Joint Committee Comments.)””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[T] he section is not one which either curtails or grants appellate jurisdiction, but is one which fixes the procedure in the trial court as to the conditions affecting the terms upon which an appeal may be taken in advance of a determination of the entire case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.