Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ill. 2d 481 - Hester v. Kamykowski

13 Ill. 2d 481 - Hester v. Kamykowski’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
4
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably 138 Ill. 2d 21 - Pullen v. Mulligan (1990), 35 Ill. 2d 33 - People Ex Rel. Meyer v. Kerner (1966)

45 state decisions

19019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People ex rel. Cant v. Crossley · Parker v. Orr · People ex rel. Agnew v. Graham · People ex rel. Woods v. Green · 13 Ill. 2d 244 - Gulino v. Cerny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Rjespondents recognize that the petition does not seek a recount but a declaration that the election was void because of an improper form of ballot. They argue that if the election was void for the offices of village clerk and police magistrate it was also void as to the office of village president, and that the judgment thus affects the interests of persons not made parties to the proceedings. The contention cannot be sustained. The judgment does not purport to affect the election for offices other than clerk and police magistrate, and they are not involved here. Weeden v. Gher, 316 111. 534, upon which respondents rely, is distinguishable. That case involved an election to an office for which there were three candidates, with two to be elected. One of the candidates was not made a party to the proceedings, although the petition alleged, and the trial court found, that he was legally elected. It was held that since a judgment could not be entered without materially affecting his interests he was a necessary party. No such circumstances are present here. The petition in the case at bar seeks to declare the election void as to the offices of clerk and police magistrate. The interests of persons elected to other offices are not involved.” ( 13 Ill. 2d at 489-90 , 150 N.E.2d at 201 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.