13 Ill. App. 3d 699 - Marcus v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 83 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably 77 Ill. 2d 313 - Smith v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (1979), Lyon v. Barrett (1982)
3 federal appellate · 83 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Reed v. Steamship Yaka · 37 Ill. 2d 273 - Miller v. DeWitt · 33 Ill. 2d 316 - Larson v. Commonwealth Edison Co. · Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co. · 22 Ill. 2d 305 - Gannon v. C., M., ST. P. & P. RY. CO.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No common law or statutory right to recover damages from the employer 0 0 0 for injury or death sustained by any employee while engaged in the line of his duty as such employee, other than the compensation herein provided, is available to any employee who is covered by the provisions of this Act * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘A partner may maintain an action at law against his copartner upon claims growing out of the following facts: ** .) Where the partnership is terminated, all debts are paid, and the partnership affairs otherwise adjusted, with nothing remaining to be done but the amount due by one to the other, such amount involving no complicated reckoning. 6.) Where the partnership is for a single venture or special purpose, which has been accomplished, and nothing remains to be done except to pay over the claimant’s share.’ ” (Emphasis in original.) 13 Ill. App. 3d 699, 708-09 , 300 N.E.2d 512 , quoting Pugh v. Newbern (1927), 193 N.C. 258, 261 , 136 S.E. 707, 708-09 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"We see no reason to suppose that the Workmen's Compensation Act has in any way limited the duty of an owner in charge to assure that scaffolds on construction property be kept safe. [Citation.]" 13 Ill. App.3d 699, 707 . "Therefore * * * since the Workmen's Compensation Act provides for recovery by an employee against a third party tort-feasor, (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 48, § 138.5), he should be allowed to bring an action against the appellant who in a different legal capacity than that of an employer has placed himself vulnerable to liability under the Scaffold Act." 13 Ill. App.3d 699, 708 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.