Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ill. App. 3d 791 - Crawley v. Bauchens

13 Ill. App. 3d 791 - Crawley v. Bauchens’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably 84 Ill. 2d 212 - Siegel v. Siegel (1981), 69 Ill. 2d 220 - Sommer v. Borovic (1978)

26 state decisions

1201973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk · Palmore v. United States · Donovan v. City of Dallas · Ex parte Bakelite Corp. · Cole v. Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[t]he law is clear in Illinois that subsequent to a divorce decree, the court granting such decree retains continuing jurisdiction of the parties with regards to children of the marriage, custody and support. (Eggemeyer v. Eggemeyer, 86 Ill. App. 2d 224 , 229 N.E.2d 144 ; Carlson v. Carlson, 80 Ill. App. 2d 251 , 225 N.E.2d 130 .) Illinois courts have but recently reiterated the specific rulé that a party may not avoid this continuing jurisdiction of the trial court which entered the original divorce decree by moving outside tire court’s geographical jurisdiction. (McClellan v. McClellan, 125 Ill. App. 2d 477 , 261 N.E.2d 216 ; Sharpe v. Sharpe, 77 Ill. App. 2d 295 , 222 N.E.2d 340 .)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.