Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ill. App. 3d 976 - Hendricks v. Deterts

13 Ill. App. 3d 976 - Hendricks v. Deterts’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 96 Ill. App. 2d 182 - Watkins v. Lewis · 83 Ill. App. 2d 258 - Brooks v. Dean Berenz Asphalt Co., Inc. · 66 Ill. App. 2d 33 - Harp v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Summary judgment is- a drastic method of disposing of litigation and the right of a party to invoke that drastic remedy must be free from doubt. [Citation.] Summary judgment has as its purpose a determination of whether or not there is any genuine triable issue of fact which must be passed upon. If the pleadings, discovery depositions, and the exhibits present a genuine issue as to any material fact, summary judgment should not be granted.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Affidavits in support of and in opposition to a motion for summary judgment under section 57 of the Civil Practice Act * ” * shall be made on the personal knowledge of the affiants; shall set forth with particularity the facts upon which the claim, counterclaim, or defense is based; shall have attached thereto sworn or certified copies of all papers upon which the affiant relies; shall not consist of conclusions but of facts admissible in evidence; and shall affirmatively show that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently thereto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.