Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Ind. 445

Harris v. Osenback

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1859-11-15

<p>APPEAL from the Hamilton Court of Common Pleas.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1910

6 state decisions

201859186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Suit upon a note. Judgment for plaintiff, by default, for 148 dollars, 25 cents.

¶2The errors assigned are, that the judgment is for 21 dollars, 78 cents too much; and that the complaint does not appear to have been subscribed by either the plaintiff or his attorney, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. p. 43.

¶3The plaintiff offers, in this Court, to remit the excess for which judgment was taken. The failure to subscribe the complaint is such a merely formal or clerical error as the plaintiff should have been permitted to amend, when pointed out in the Court below, and will be considered as amended here.

¶4If the plaintiff should remit the excess, the judgment is affirmed at the cost of the appellee, incurred in this Court; if the excess is not remitted, the judgment is reversed, &c._

/13/ind/445 · .json · Public domain