Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 INDAPP 80 - Kingan & Co. v. Silvers

Kingan & Co. v. Silvers’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
6
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably American Savings Life Insurance v. Riplinger (1933), Efroymson v. Smith (1902)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

40189419001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Co. v. Weddle · Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKee · Bowser & Lemmon v. Cole · Ætna Insurance v. Kittles · Bigelow v. Stilphen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose [of the statute of frauds] was to preserve and perpetuate the evidence of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.