Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 I. & N. Dec. 264

POULIN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1969

Board of Immigration Appeals · decided 1969-07-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1979

2 federal appellate ·

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“there is no certification that there were not sufficient workers in the United States able, willing, qualified, and available to do the work the applicant intended to do at the time of his original and present application for admission . . . . .”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Yui Sing Tse v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Interim Decision # 1973




                          MATTER OF POULIN.

                       In Exclusion Proceedings
                              A-18151469
                    Decided by Board May 2, 1969
Notwithstanding an alien upon entry presented an immigrant visa supported
 by a certification from the Secretary of Labor, reported to the certified
 job and actually pursued it for a short period of time, he was not in possession of a valid Labor certification at entry where it was his intention
 throughout to pursue other employment for which he did not have a certification.
Ever.inuntn: Act of 1952—Section 212 (a) (20) [8 U.S.C. 11823—Immigrant,
                            no visa.


   On October 22, 1968, the special inquiry officer directed that
the applicant be excluded and deported from the United States on
the above-stated ground. The applicant waived his right to appeal
from that decision of the special inquiry officer. However, the
District Director at Portland, Maine, certified the case to this
Board for review and final decision.
   The record relates to a 31-year-old married male alien, a native
and citizen of Canada, who was admitted to the United States for
permanent residence on July 29, 1968. He then presented an immigration visa which was supported by a certification from the
Secretary of Labor. That labor certification showed that the applicant was destined to the Bates Manufacturing Co., Inc., Lewiston, Maine, for employment as a "weaver learner," at a salary of
$1.65 an hour.
   The applicant did work for the Bates Manufacturing Co. for
one day, but then quit because he became ill. He then remained in
Lewiston, Maine, for two days until he felt better. Thereafter, he
returned to Canada where his wife, their child, and his parents,
all natives and nationals of Canada, reside.
   The applicant remained in Canada until -September 10, 1968,
when he applied for admission into this country as a returning
resident, to take employment in the woods. At that time he pre-

                                  264
                                            Interim Decision #1973
  sented no documents, but inquired as to whether his Alien Registration Receipt and Border Crossing Identification Card (Form
 I-151) was available to him. He was thereupon referred for a
 hearing before a special inquiry officer, with the above-described
  result.
    The applicant testified that at the time of his original entry on
 July 29, 1968, he only intended to work for the Bates Manufacturing Co. until he could obtain his Alien Registration Receipt and Border Crossing Identification Card. He stated that a
 Canadian named Toulouse, of Lac Megnatic, P.Q., Canada, assisted him in applying for his visa, and told him that although he
 would obtain the labor certification for the Bates Manufacturing
 Co., he need not continue to work for that company after he entered the United States and obtained his 1-151, and that thereafter he could go anywhere he wished. He admitted that at the time
 of his original entry he intended, after obtaining his 1 151, to
                                                            -


 work on lumbering operations with his brother and his brotherin-law, both of whom are permanent residents of the United
 States.
    The applicant set forth that he has been working on lumbering
 operations in the United States for the past 13 years. He indicated that he was previously admitted each year under bond to
 work in the woods, but that it has now become very difficult to
 obtain admission under bond for such work, and that one must
 obtain a visa to get regular employment in lumbering operations
in the woods in Maine. It was because of these difficulties that he
applied for an immigrant visa, after consulting with the Canadian named Toulouse. He conceded that at the time of his original
entry into the United States he intended to work in the woods
with his brothers, and that he had no wish to work for the Bates
Manufacturing Co.
    Summarizing briefly, the applicant obtained his visa and his
original admission into the United States so that he could work in
the woods with relatives. The labor certification he then presented, and on the basis of which his visa was issued, showed
that he was destined to the Bates Manufacturing Co. for employment as a weaver learner. He had consulted with an individual in
Canada who had advised him that he need only enter upon such
employment and then could leave immediately upon receipt of his
Alien Registration Receipt and Border Crossing Identification
Card, with which he could then go to work anywhere he pleased.
He then intended, as is the case now, to work in this country as a
                                265
Interim Decision #1973
 commuter and reside in Canada with his wife and child while not
 actually employed in the woods in this country.
    Section 212 (a) (14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
 provides that an alien shall be ineligible to receive a visa and for
 admission into the United States unless he is in possession of a
 certification issued by the Secretary of Labor. 29 CFR 60.5 states
 that the requisite labor certification is invalid if the representations upon which it is based are incorrect, and that it covers only
the position described in the request therefor. Application of the
foregoing facts of record in the light of these provisions of the
law and the related regulations convinces us that the special inquiry officer's decision to exclude the applicant was correct.
    The applicant did not have a certification covering the work he
actually intended to do in the United States, to wit, lumbering operations in the woods. Therefore, he was not in possession of a
valid labor certification at the time of his entry into the United
States on July 29, 1968. He was, accordingly, not then eligible for
the visa which he presented. Hence, he is not now a bona fide returning resident alien inasmuch as he has never procured a labor
certification for the employment to which he is destined, nor has
he ever procured any visa other than the one which he presented
on July 29, 1968.
   In conclusion, the purpose of section 212 (a) (14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is to protect the American workingman by keeping the labor market from being flooded, and wages
                     ,


and working conditions from being depressed. Here, there is no
certification that there were not sufficient workers in the United
States able, willing, qualified, and available to do the work the applicant intended to do at the time of his original and present application for admission, nor is there any certification that his employment in that industry would not adversely affect wages and
working conditions of American workers similarly employed. As
a matter of fact, the contrary is indicated by the applicant's testimony that he has worked in the woods under bond each year
since he was 18 years of age, but that it is now difficult to be admitted under bond to do that work. All we can add, in this
connection, is that the statute states that the provisions of the
section here pertinent shall apply to special immigrants born in
Canada other than'the parents, spouses, and children of United
States citizens or residents lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and that the applicant, a special immigrant born in Canada, is not the parent, spouse or child of a United States citizen
or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

                                266
                                         Interim Decision #1973
  Under the foregoing circumstances, we concur in the special inquiry officer's conclusion that the applicant is excludable as an
immigrant not in possession of a valid immigrant visa or other
entry document valid in lieu thereof. Accordingly, the special inquiry officer's decision is approved.
  ORDER: It is ordered that the special inquiry officer's decision
of October 22, 1968, directing that the applicant be excluded and
deported from the United States, be and the same is hereby affirmed,




                              267

/13/indec/264 · .json · Public domain