Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 I&NDEC 494 - ARAI

ARAI’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2023 · most notably Elkins v. Moreno (1978), Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1994)

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

130197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on ORTIZ-PRIETO

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where adverse factors are present in a given application, it may be necessary for the applicant to offset these by a showing of unusual or even outstanding equities. Generally, favorable factors such as family ties, hardship, length of residence in the United States, etc., will be considered as countervailing factors meriting favorable exercise of administrative discretion. In the absence of adverse factors, adjustment will ordinarily be granted, still as a matter of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally, favorable factors such as family ties, hardship, length of residence in the United States, etc., will be considered as countervailing factors meriting favorable exercise of administrative discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “restrictive guide lines for the exercise of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.