Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Johns. 85

Northrop v. Minturn

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1816

New York Supreme Court · decided 1816-01-15

ERROR, on a certiorari to a justice’s court. Minturn brought a suit against Northrop, on a promissory note given by Northrop to Minturn, for 25 dollars. The defence was, that the note was given for a gaming debt.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1913

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1816-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Supposing the true construction of the evidence to be, that part of the consideration of the note was for the use of a billiard table, in playing billiards at the house of Minturn ; yet, as there is no evidence that Minturn then kept a tavern, it was not an unlawful contract; there being no evidence that it was for money lost at play.

¶2The judgment below must fee affirmed.

/13/johns/85 · .json · Public domain