Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 KAN 164 - Hook v. Bixby

Hook v. Bixby’s Empirical Analysis

1874

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1994

4 state decisions

101874188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Now as the plaintiff, in the case supposed, has a half of the first day in which to sue and a half of the last day in which to sue, the statute for the computation of time comes in and says that the time within which the plaintiff may sue shall be computed by excluding the whole of the first day and including the whole of the last.” (p. 169.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The time within which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last; if the last day be Sunday, it shall be excluded.” (R. S. 60-3819.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.