13 Kan. App. 2d 60 - State v. Burnett’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Dinitz · United States v. Josef Perez · State v. McQueen & Hardyway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant should not be able to challenge a mistrial declaration and claim double jeopardy where the mistrial was caused by the defense attorney's misconduct or error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Owens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.