Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 La. Ann. 486

State v. O'Conner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1858

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1858-12-15

<p>When a statute punishing an offence has been repealed without any saving clause, as to prosecutions already commenced, it operates as a pardon to persons convicted under such repealed statute.</p> <p>It is tho duty of the court, ex officio, to notice the repeal of laws.</p>

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1942

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Merricic, 0. J.,

¶1concurring. There is a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case because there is neither a bill of exception nor an assignment of errors in the record.

¶2For my views on the motion to dismiss I refer to what we have said in the case of State v. Henderson, a slave, just decided.

On the merits, I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Oole.
/13/laann/486 · .json · Public domain