Assumpsit on a policy of insurance, dated November 2, 1813 ; by which the plaintiffs, as well in their own names, as for and in the names of any other person or persons, are insured the sum of $500, on the Spanish brig San Pedro, and $2000 on her cargo, from Boston to the Havanna. There was a stipulation in the policy, that, in case of loss, no proof of property should be required, and that there should be no return of premium. The policy also contained a clause in these words ; — “In case of capture, the assured agree to claim and prosecute as Spanish property, and to prosecute the same until * condemnation in the High Court of Admiralty, or acquittal; and the assurers agree to contribute to the expenses thereof to the assured, according to their respective interests.”

At the trial, w'hich was had at the last November term in this county, before Jackson, J., it appeared, that the plaintiffs were owners of one half of the vessel and cargo, exceeding in value the sum insured, the whole being covered as Spanish property. The vessel, while sailing on the voyage insured, sustained some damage in a storm, which rendered it necessary to put into the nearest port. She arrived at New Providence, where, after landing a part of the cargo, the vessel and the remainder of the cargo were seized as prize of war; and were afterwards, in December, 1813, libelled and condemned in the Court of Vice-Admiralty there.

No claim was made in the said Court of Vice-Admiralty for the said vessel or cargo, nor was an appeal claimed from the said decree of condemnation. Th? Spanish master, who conducted the business there for the owners of the vessel and cargo, made a protest; and it was said by some merchants and others at New Providence, that the owners might, upon such a protest, claim and prosecute an appeal, as well as if a claim had been filed in the common form in the said Court of Vice-Admiralty.

Upon receiving advice of the said loss, the plaintiffs communicated the intelligence to the underwriters on the policy, and demanded payment as for a total loss.

Some time in the summer of 1814, the plaintiffs informed the underwriters by letter, that no appeal was claimed by the master at New Providence ; because he was unable to give the bond required in such case, or to deposit the £200 sterling, which is necessary when such bond is not given ; and upon receipt of that sum they undertook to claim the appeal.

On the 31st of October, 1814, they sent another letter to the underwriters, stating, that they considered the said* underwriters as alone interested in the business ; and that they ought accordingly to instruct the plaintiffs how to proceed, and to furnish them with the money necessary for the purpose ; and adding, that, if there was any doubt which party ought to advance the money, they would leave that question'to any suitable men.

…

Citation profile

How this case has been treated — in progress