Pemberton v. Boas’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2021
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boyle v. Wenk · DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc. · Coughlan v. City of Cambridge · Goldstein v. Gontarz · Griffin v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both [ McElwain v. Capotosto and Nassif v. Smith ] recognize ... that the admissibility of [evidence of collateral source income] for that purpose [to show malingering] is within the discretion of the judge, and we cannot say the judge abused his discretion in excluding it here”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.