Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 McCanless 506 - Dupes v. State

Dupes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 1997 · most notably State v. Middlebrooks (1992), State v. Fowler (1963)

32 state decisions

2201962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. State · Smith v. State · Ford v. State · Wynn v. State · O'BRIEN v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The fact that a prospective juror has read about a case in a newspaper or heard some person mention it, is not sufficient to disqualify him if he is otherwise qualified and if he states on oath that, notwithstanding what he read or heard, he believes he can give the defendant a fair and impartial trial upon the law and the evidence. Manning v. State, 155 Tenn. 266, 277 , 292 S.W. 451 ; O’Brien v. State, 205 Tenn. 405, 420-421 , 326 S.W.2d 759 ; Smith v. State, 205 Tenn. 502, 533 , 327 S.W.2d 308 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.