Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Md. App. 270 - Flores v. King

13 Md. App. 270 - Flores v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 1998 · most notably Eastgate Associates v. Apper (1976), 66 Md. App. 635 - Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc. (1986)

27 state decisions

130197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKeon v. State, Use of Conrad · Clough & Molloy, Inc. v. Shilling · Picking v. State Finance Corp. · State, Ex Rel. Dunnigan v. Cobourn · Harkins v. August

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment upon one or more but less than all of the claims only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates less than all the claims shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.