13 Md. App. 546 - Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
November 1977
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ventresca · 11 Md. App. 55 - Buckner v. State · 3 Md. App. 208 - Scarborough v. State · Borras v. State · 13 Md. App. 151 - Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““AFFIDAVIT in support of a Search and Seizure Warrant for the premises known as 1210 McElderry Court apartment A-3 which is kept, rented, used or occupied by a colored male known as Horace and a C/F one Brenda Stokes. “By: Officer Robert Cohen and Leonard Santivasci Eastern Special Operations. “After receiving information concerning Narcotics Violations being committed at 1210 Mc-Elderry Court Apartment A-3 we sent a informant who has been reliable in the past giving information in 12 cases of Narcotic violations to this location. He stated he was admitted to the apartment by a colored female known to him as Brenda Stokes and once inside he met a colored male known to him as Horace. He stated he had a conversation with Horace about trying to buy drugs. Horace stated he had just got some good stuff in, but it wasn’t ready yet and they walked into the kitchen and the informant observed empty glassine bags on the table along with measuring spoons and a quantity of white powder. The subject Horace stated it would be a while before he could do anything for him and that when he was ready it would be on the street with his dealers and not to come to the house as he didn’t want him there. The informant is familiar with the gelatin caps and envelopes used in the Narcotic operations as he is a addict himself. “Because the source of information to the affiants mentioned in the opening paragraphs has given information to the affiants on previous occasions and which was correct and becaus”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Edwards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.