Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Misc. 322

Groff v. Hagan

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1895

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1895-06-15

<p>An order for a hill of particulars will not he granted on the affidavit of the attorney.</p>

Decided 1895-06-15

Newburger, J.

¶1Without considering all the questions raised by the appellant, there is one reason why the order appealed from should be reversed.

¶2The affidavit upon which the order is made is by the attorney for the plaintiff.

¶3It has been repeatedly held that an order for a bill of particulars will not be granted on the affidavit of the attorney. Van Olinda v. Hall, 31 N. Y. Supp. 495; Dueber Co. v. Keystone Co., 21 id. 442; Gridley v. Gridley, 7 Civ. Proc. Rep. 215.

¶4The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with costs.

¶5Conlan, J., concurs.

¶6Order reversed, with costs.

/13/misc/322 · .json · Public domain