13 Neb. Ct. App. 586 - State v. Roy T.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Interest of Amber G. · In Re Interest of Mainor T. · In Re Interest of Aaron D. · In Re Sabrina K. · State v. Larry P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rights of the parent and the child are protected separately by the adjudication and dispositional phases of juvenile proceedings. . . . Allegations in a petition brought under § 43-247(3)(a) are brought on behalf of the child, not to punish the parents. . . . The purpose of the adjudication phase is to protect the interests of the child .... The parents’ rights are determined at the dispositional phase, not at the adjudication phase.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The juvenile court in each county as herein provided shall have jurisdiction of: (3) Any juvenile (a) . . . who lacks proper parental care by reason of the fault or habits of his or her parent, guardian, or custodian ... or who is in a situation or engages in an occupation dangerous to life or limb or injurious to the health or morals of such juvenile ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“substantially and continuously or repeatedly neglected and refused to give the juvenile . . . necessary parental care and protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.