State v. Grothmann’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 1995 · most notably State v. La Fera (1961), 16 Ariz. App. 246 - State v. Fogel (1972)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Tai v. United States · People v. Bogdanoff · Commonwealth v. Snow · State v. Morano · Delawter v. Delawter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is fundamental in the constitutional limitation that an indictment is not amendable by the court to charge an offense not found by the grand jury, either by a substitution of offense or to supply substantive omissions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense, unless on the presentment or indictment of a grand jury * * **.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gledhill“may not be disregarded or amended in order to permit a trial upon a crime not charged by the grand jury * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.