Kirschler v. Albanesius’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. Denn Page · State ex rel. Fritts v. Kuhl · Liddel v. McVickar · Den ex dem. Johnson v. Morris · State ex rel. Schalk v. Wrightson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question is whether the use of the word ‘title’ alone in the justice’s court act shows that such title has reference solely to freeholds. “A series of decisions of the courts of this state uniformly show that it does not, but that, on the contrary, it covers all claims of any quality to the possession of land, in so far as such claims to possession are distinguished from the actual physical possession of the land. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Wintermute
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.