13 N.J. Super. 350 - Bardack v. Extract’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on J. B. Wolfe, Inc. v. Salkind · Fischetto Paper Mill Supply, Inc. v. Quigley Co., Inc. · Bachman Chocolate Manufacturing Co. v. Lehigh Warehouse & Transportation Co. · Rottinger v. Friedhof · 3 N.J. Super. 64 - Nusser v. United Parcel Service of N.Y., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition, the jury in calculating the amount of damages that would reasonably and properly compensate the plaintiff were warranted in giving consideration to existing economic conditions, to wit: the high cost of living and the decrease in the purchasing power of the dollar. Nusser v. United Parcel Service of N.Y., Inc., supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.