Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 NY2D 296 - People v. Robinson

People v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably 71 Cal. 2d 761 - People v. Schader (1969), 63 Cal. 2d 880 - People v. Buchanan (1966)

11 federal appellate · 15 state decisions

2301963197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States · People v. Rutigliano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As to the use of the guns unearthed in the attic of the house where Jackson resided, we are compelled by decisions of the United States Supreme Court to apply the rule that, if the evidence to which objection is made was acquired by exploitation of the primary illegality, such evidence must also be excluded. [Citations.] The guns were the 'fruit' of the inadmissible incriminating statements made to Bradley which led to the search without a warrant. [Citations.] Under the circumstances, it is incumbent upon the District Attorney to show that the location of the guns was discovered through a source untainted by the admissions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where, as here, the arraignment on a vagrancy charge is merely a sham [People v. Davis, 13 N.Y.2d 690 , 241 N.Y.S.2d 172 , 191 N.E.2d 674 (1963)] the admissions are excluded because they were made during a period when the detention was merely a pretext for holding the defendant in connection with the investigation of the homicide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.