¶1We have carefully read all the testimony in this case, and are satisfied plaintiff made out a prima face case for the jury. There is testimony which strongly tends to show that defendant, knowing him to be a real-estate broker, employed plaintiff to sell certain premises; that plaintiff brought the same to the attention of the purchasers, and brought them and the defendant together; and that defendant sold these parties the premises for the price he asked. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
13 N.Y.S. 567
Turner v. Putnam
Decided February 24, 1891
New York City Court · decided 1891-02-24
Action by Nathan A. Turner against Henry W. Putnam to recover commissions for procuring a sale of defendant’s real estate. Prom a judgment dismissing the complaint the plaintiff appeals.
Decided 1891-02-24