¶1We have examined the record in the case at bar, and see no reason to differ from the conclusion arrived at by the judge at the special term. None of the objections presented upon the record are well taken, and we do not think it necessary to refer to them in detail, because the counsel for the appellant has not considered the question of sufficient importance to refer in his points to the correct folios in the case affecting the same, but reference is made to folios in some'imaginary ease which is not before the court. The order should be affirmed,' with costs.
13 N.Y.S. 705
Pandjiris v. McQueen
Decided March 13, 1891
New York Supreme Court · decided 1891-03-13
Claim by Sarah J. Pandjiris against the estate of Alfred Gr. McQueen, deceased, presented to John McQueen, as administrator of said estate, and referred under Kev. St. pt. 2, c. 6, tit. 3, art. 2, § 36, providing for the reference of any claim so presented, “if the executor or'administrator doubt the justice” of the claim.
Decided 1891-03-13